XSplit consumes 2% CPU resources while idling. During the launch of the stream, CPU usage will jump to 12%. Finally, it will settle back between 3% and 4%. OBS performs better with its 60fps recording capability at 1152 x 658 resolution level. It offers you better detailing with satisfactory view. XSplit can’t work with 60fps frame rate during 720p recording. You also need to note that XSplit performs poorly during setup and navigation. It may take you much time to create new scenes. You are even required to force quits for several times when XSplit becomes unresponsive. Differently, OBS doesn’t have this issue. XSplit vs OBS: which one is better? OBS wins on the aspect of performance. XSplit includes numerous options for local recording like x264 and x265 video codes. Besides, it also contains a well-thought-out feature that allows you to optimize audio and video. This feature makes it a better choice for YouTube uploads. Though it doesn’t enable you to optimize audio and video, it offers more file formats like VLC. ![]() OBS vs XSplit on audio/video quality, XSplit wins. CustomizationsĪs an open-source platform, OBS supports more third-party plugins at its website compared with the proprietary interface of XSplit. In addition, OBS offers plenty of customization options. ![]() On the aspect of just ease of use and accessibility, OBS has more to offer than its pay to use competitor – Xsplit. Last but not least, you should take price into consideration when choosing a game streaming platform. As a piece of open-source software, OBS is available for free with multiple features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |